Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Medical Department #33- Addison D. Bridgman, M.D.

“SHERMAN COMPLETELY RUINED ME”

By James M. Schmidt

The Civil War News – “Medical Department” – Feb/Mar 2010


This month’s column is based on an interesting postwar (1866) letter I recently added to my collection. Though the letter itself is short, further research has revealed some wonderful elements of an interesting story: the letter writer was a native of New England (and an Ivy Leaguer!) who moved south before the war, joined a Confederate regiment, served as a nurse and hospital steward, jumpstarted a medical career in war-ravaged Georgia, and is part of a quite interesting family.

But first, the letter:

Scarboro Screven Co. Ga.
30 November 1866

A.T. Stewart

New York Sir:

I have often heard your name spoken of in deeds of mercy & kindness & trust you will excuse me for asking a favor of you. I was formerly a teacher, a native of N.H., but Sherman in his grand march completely ruined me. But on that ruin I am struggling to build myself again. Our country is just now badly bankrupt & I am trying to make an honest living by the practice of medicine. The favor is this: Could you not send me a pocket case of instruments (3-ply) & wait on me for a short time. I am needing them every few days but am unable to secure them. I used to have many acquaintances in N.Y. before the war but have no knowledge of them since. I enclose a card where the best instruments can be obtained.

Very Truly,

A.D. Bridgman, M.D.

Note: Bridgman enclosed a calling card for George Tiemann & Co., the eminent manufacturer and dealer in surgical instruments (see photo of actual card!)

So…Who is A.T. Stewart? Who is A.D. Bridgman? And is there anything else interesting here? (The answer to that question is a definitive “Yes”!). Clues in the letter (beginning with connections to Screven County, Georgia, and New Hampshire) led me to identify “A.D. Bridgman” – our main “character” – as Addison Daniel Bridgman, after consulting college directories, period newspapers, census information, published family histories, and (most interesting!) Confederate service records.

As for “A.T. Stewart,” he is almost certainly the famous businessman Alexander Turney Stewart. Stewart was born in Ireland in 1803 and effectively orphaned when his father died shortly after his birth and his mother remarried and sailed to America. He was then raised by his grandfather, who in turn passed away when Stewart was a teenager. By then he had begun a correspondence with his mother and soon wanted to travel to America himself. He gained some business experience working with a grocer and - with his savings – left Belfast for New York City in 1818.

Stewart was a natural salesman and opened his first retail store, specializing in Irish and domestic fabrics, in 1823. He built the small store into a thriving business and by 1848 had completed his “marble palace” on Broadway as well as a tremendously successful mail order business. By the time of the Civil War, Stewart was one of the wealthiest men in America. No doubt Bridgman felt comfortable in asking Stewart for the favor as the retailer had gained a reputation for charity, trust, and lenient credit terms; indeed, he would often send products to his mail order customers (postage paid!) before they had paid for the goods themselves.

A.D. Bridgman was indeed a “native of N.H.,” as he wrote, having been born in 1832 in Hanover, New Hampshire, to Daniel and Harmony Bridgman. Daniel was deacon of the Baptist church of Hanover for many years and held most of the town offices, served in the state legislature, and was a successful businessman. A published family history, Genealogy of the Bridgman Family (1894), indicated that the Bridgman patriarch was “worthy and esteemed by all.” The family was large: Addison was the fourth of nine children (three boys and six girls), although tragedy would strike them.

A.D. Bridgman was also – as he wrote in his letter - “formerly a teacher.” He attended Thetford Academy in Vermont, Kimball Union Academy in Meriden, N.H., and Dartmouth College (1852-54), and then attended a year’s course of lectures in Dartmouth’s Medical Department. For reasons unknown, he settled in Georgia in 1856, teaching in schools in Macon and Hawkinsville, before opening his own school in Screven County.

In the 1860 census, Bridgman is listed as a “teacher” in Screven County, but his birthplace is listed as North Carolina! F. Terry Hambrecht, M.D., an esteemed medical historian (who kindly provided me with the census information), wonders if Bridgman (falsely) represented himself as being from a southern state so that local citizens wouldn’t suspect him of having abolitionist sympathies. It’s interesting to consider!

In 1866, Bridgman (who married late in 1860) was still in Georgia, where he hoped to open a medical practice; thus the letter to A. T. Stewart asking for a favor. But what of the intervening years of the Civil War, 1861-1865? That’s the interesting part! In his letter to A.T. Stewart, Bridgman left out a very important piece of information; he simply stated that “Sherman in his grand march completely ruined me.” What he failed to mention is that while Sherman was “marching through Georgia,” Bridgman was fighting with the 25th Georgia Infantry!

The 25th Georgia Infantry Regiment was organized at Savannah, Georgia, in September, 1861. The unit served on the coast until the summer of 1863 when it was ordered to Mississippi. It fought with the Army of Tennessee from Chickamauga to Atlanta and saw action at Bentonville. The unit was greatly reduced in numbers by the time it surrendered on April 26, 1865.

Whether or not Bridgman himself was shooting at men from the Granite State or other New Englanders is hard to say. While the 25th saw significant action in the latter part of the war, Bridgman’s compiled service record indicates that he spent most of the war on detached service.

In early 1862, he was reported as on “sick leave” back home in Screven County. Later that year he was detailed to work on a “floating battery” and “gun boat” at Savannah. In November 1863, he appeared on the roll of the Ocmulgee Hospital in Macon, Georgia, with the complaint of “anasarca” or “dropsy,” a general swelling of the body due to fluid buildup in tissues. For most of 1863 – and to the end of the war – Bridgman was a nurse and then “acting hospital steward” at City Hall hospital in Macon and then Lee hospital in Columbus, perhaps taking advantage of his year’s worth of formal medical education.

When the war was over, Bridgman returned to New Hampshire, took another year’s medical courses at Dartmouth, received his M.D., and returned to Screven County to practice medicine, teach, and serve as postmaster. Bridgman and his wife, Salome, moved to Decatur, Illinois in 1874, where he resumed his medical practice, before passing away in 1916.

Addison Bridgman also had a very well-known older sister: Laura Bridgman. Born in 1829, Laura is famous for being a deaf-blind child who received instruction a full fifty years before Helen Keller. The Bridgman family was struck with scarlet fever in 1832, losing Laura and Addison’s two older sisters to the disease. Laura was left deaf, blind, and with no sense of smell or taste.

Through the kindness and expert care of people like Dr. Samuel Gridley Howe and other tutors, Laura learned to write, do arithmetic. She even attracted the attention of Charles Dickens, who wrote of Laura and Howe in his American Notes. It was Dickens’ account of Laura Bridgman that prompted Helen Keller’s mother to seek treatment for her daughter several decades later. Laura Bridgman was very fond of her younger brother, Addison, and he is mentioned often in her journals.

So, a letter of less than 150 words reveals a most interesting life, and the information left out is as interesting as the information within.

Thursday, February 4, 2010

"Years of Change and Suffering" Featured on "Civil War Talk Radio"!/UPDATED - LINK TO BROADCAST!


We are happy to announce that Guy Hasegawa, Pharm.D., co-editor of and contributor to Years of Change and Suffering: Modern Perspectives on Civil War Medicine (Edinborough Press, 2009) will be the guest of Dr. Gerry Prokopowicz on Civil War Talk Radio, tomorrow, February 5, 2010!

You can listen to the program live at 3pm Eastern Time and I'll post a link to the archived MP3 when it is available after the live broadcast.
Besides talking about Years of Change and Suffering, Gerry will also (hopefully!) ask Guy about some of his other OUTSTANDING research, which you can learn more about here:
(and more!)
Break a leg, Guy!

****************************************

UPDATED! HERE IS A LINK TO THE BROADCAST!

http://www.voiceamerica.com/worldtalkradio/vepisode.aspx?aid=44386

Monday, February 1, 2010

"Civil War Books and Authors" Reviews "Years of Change and Suffering"!

Drew Wagenhoffer at Civil War Books and Authors runs one of the best blogs I've seen. In addition to thorough reviews he also alerts readers to upcoming titles and conducts excellent author interviews (see recent ones here and here).

We are so pleased that he took the time to post a favorable review of Years of Change and Suffering: Modern Perspectives on Civil War Medicine (Edinborough Press, 2009), our co-edited collection of invited expert essays.

Excerpts:

"Years of Change and Suffering [is] a useful and very readable collection of original essays covering a variety of important figures and topics associated with Civil War medicine."

"...the articles, all well documented scholarly essays, are written by...quite a distinguished assemblage."

"Containing scholarly essays that explore in some depth a mixture of general and specialized medical and scientific topics (yet can be for the most part readily comprehended by a general reading audience), Years of Change and Suffering is a highly recommended contribution to the effort at furthering a more accurate popular reassessment of Civil War medicine."

Thanks, Drew!

See more reviews of Years of Change and Suffering here:

DON'T FORGET THAT ALL ROYALTIES FROM YEARS OF CHANGE AND SUFFERING ARE BEING DONATED TO CIVIL WAR MEDICAL HERITAGE PRESERVATION!

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Civil War Phrenological Profiles #2 - "Stonewall" Jackson - "Honesty of Purpose"

Another profile of a Civil War personality from the pages of the American Phrenological Journal (July 1863) in my collection! This one for Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson, and all the more fitting in that today is his birthdate!

Note first the "disclaimer" explaining why a Confederate general found his way into the pages of the Journal:

"From our high scientific stand-point we look upon the subjects of our delineations as individuals - as men or women with human organizations, and the propensities, faculties, and sentiments, high and low, common to the genus homo - and not as patriots or rebels, republicans or democrats; nor do we knowingly or willingly permit our wn political or religious preferences to bias our statements."

Perhaps. But as you will see at the end of their profile, the Journal did comment on the general's cause. Given the issue date, this was - of course - a posthumous profile as well:

"The name of 'Stonewall' Jackson is as widely known as the Great rebellion, in connections with which it will claim a place in history. Was he intrinsically and by virtue of his organization a great man, or did he owe his position and celebrity to circumstances merely? He was regarded by friend and foe as brave, generous, just, high-minded, and pre-eminently religious. Was he rightly esteemed in these particulars? It remains for us to set forth here his true character as indicated by his organization."

Phrenological examinations were best done in person, of course. The Journal then states that they did not use the engraving shown in its pages, but rather a "life-like portrait in our possession and a carte de visite portrait taken a short time before his death." From both they inferred:

"That his physique - his bodily organization- was excellent...a large and well-formed chest...lungs and heart were large, his circulation and respiration perfect, his digestion good, and all the vital functions in healthy activity...Not being addicted to dissipation, and being, we believe, strictly temperate in all things, his bodily as well as his mental power was always available for immediate application to the work on hand."

His digestion good?! How do you explain the lemons, then?!

"That his brain was large, fine in texture, and of excellent quality. There was 'no mud in it' and no 'dormancy' in any of its organs. His head was decidedly broad at its base in the region of Destructiveness and Combativeness...Constructiveness was large, as was Secretiveness...Cautiousness was only moderate; and it was deficiency of this organ, perhaps, that led to his premature death...Large Mirthfulness is seen in the fullness on each side of the upper part of the forehead, as well as in the upward curve of the corners of the mouth. giving a cheerful expression to the face..."

The Journal then comments on his fitness for command...

"In the chin we observe indications of strong desires restrained and controlled by an extraordinary will-power. He was remarkably self-willed, and determined; aqlways perfectly master of himself, and therefore fitted to command others."

...and concludes with an assessment of the course he took in fighting for the Confederacy:

"Veneration, Conscientiousness, Hope, and Spirituality were all large; and whatever may be said or thought of the soundness of his judgment or the correctness of his views on any particular subject, there can be no doubt of the religious tendencies of his mind, the puritanic strictness of his moral code, or his integrity and honesty of purpose. Far in the wrong as he was, he must, from his organization, have pursued the course that seemed to him right. His was a zeal and earnestness worthy of a better cause."

Previous profiles can be found here:

#1 - Abraham Lincoln

Friday, January 8, 2010

Civil War Pension Fraud is No Laughing Matter...OH YES IT IS!

I have written posts and columns before on the Civil War pension system, and more posts, images, and columns are coming this year.

The pension system had (at least) five important pillars: the pensioners, beneficiaries (widows, orphans, etc), pension attorneys, pension doctors, and the Pension Bureau.

At one time or another, all five pillars (but especially the pensioners, attorneys, and doctors) were subject to significant scrutiny and criticism for extensive fraud. Some of this was quite serious, but it also led to a significant amount of ridicule and humor in the late 19th century, a few example of which are below:

1) My favorite! A joke involving Bull Run, first published in Puck in 1887 and then widely copied in papers and magazines:

Pension Doctor : What battle were you in?
Pension Fraud: Bull Run.
Pension Doctor: Were you wounded there ?
Pension Fraud : I would have been if I had waited.
Pension Doctor : For what do you claim a pension ?
Pension Fraud : For loss of wind.

2) Potty (and private parts) humor was another staple as shown below (1893):

"It is common report that sailors do sometimes fall off their ships and hurt themselves. Rarely does a seaman, that is, an ordinary seaman, say an untruth. I have met but one instance in my pension experience. This old salt swore he fell overboard while serving on the U. S. S. Arethusa and scraped his legs on the barnacles on the vessel's bottom. The result " was chronic ulcers which disable him to this day," for which he humbly asked a pension. The examining board reported that "his general appearance was good; all internal organs healthy, but that scars on the penis, in the groin, along the line of the tibiae, roughness of the long bones, enlargement of post-cervical glands, etc., show that ' Arethusa' was not the name of the ' bottom' that scraped him."

3) And a cartoon, also from Puck, which was particularly harsh in editorializing against pension fraud:



Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Medical Department #32 - Religious Tracts for Wounded and Sick Soldiers

The newest installment of my "Medical Department" column in The Civil War News describes religious tracts intended for sick and wounded soldiers...it has tons of hyperlinks to period texts. Enjoy!

A BALM FROM GILEAD
By James M. Schmidt
The Civil War News – “Medical Department” – January 2010

“Said a poor desolate boy – who had no friends, and no home to go to, and consequently no desire to leave the hospital, which to the rest was so dreary – ‘Oh! But that was a comforting book you gave me!’ ‘What was it?’ was my inquiry. ‘Words of Healing,’ he replied.’” – Letter, nurse Jane Boswell, Presbyterian Banner, December 2, 1863

During the Civil War, the United States Christian Commission stated that its primary objective was “furnishing them [Union soldiers] religious tracts, periodicals, and books.” One of the primary publishers of such texts was the aptly named “American Tract Society.” Founded in 1825, the society was very prolific during the war: by 1862, the New England branch alone could justly boast of 175 titles published and more than a million individual tracts distributed. Other organizations - including the American Bible Society, the Presbyterian Board of Publication, Protestant Episcopal Book Society, Catholic tract societies - and private individuals also published religious literature for the soldiers.

Some of the titles were devotional, such as The Soldier’s Pocket Book and The Hymn-Book for the Army and Navy; others were meant to inspire by pointing to the piety of national heroes such as George Washington or as in A Soldier of the Cumberland, written by the father of a fallen Wisconsin soldier; others warned against vice, such as The Temperance Letter or Satan’s Baits. Of particular interest to readers of this column are tracts that were published to provide comfort to soldiers in the hospitals. Among these special tracts was Words of Healing for the Sick Soldier (American Tract Society, 1862). I have an original in my collection and am happy to provide some excerpts below.

The booklet is small – about 4x6 inches – but has an attractive tooled magenta cover with an image embossed in gold leaf on the front: the title, “Words of Healing,” surrounded by the Bible, the Constitution, flags, rifles, cannon, and shot. The text of thirty-two pages was written by “Mrs. H. E. Brown.” I do not know much about her, except that she wrote several tracts before, during, and after the war, including John Freeman and his Family (1864), which was intended for newly-emancipated slaves.

The booklet begins with an introduction entitled “Kind Words,” in which Mrs. Brown states:

“Dear, sick, suffering soldier, tossing with pain upon your comfortless pallet in the hospital, let me bring to you a few words of sympathy and love. Gladly would I come to your bedside if I could and minister to your wants…But I am not permitted to do this. All I can do is stand at a distance and lift up to heaven, in your behalf, the supplicating hand, and send to you the assurance of my kindest regard. You are not, and shall not, be forgotten.”

In the main, the tract consists of about a dozen short sections of consolation and devotion, each beginning with the words or question of an imagined suffering soldier, followed by hymns or fitting passages from scripture provided by an “Unseen Friend.” As examples, the sections include: “Heavenly Pity” (“I am racked and tortured with pain”); “Surpassing Tenderness” (“Oh, for my mother, my dear mother! If her hand could only be laid upon my head!”); “Comfort for the Weak and Weary” (“How wearisome is this long confinement in this cheerless, miserable place!”); “Glimpse of Heaven” (“Heaven seems distant and dark. Whither, ah whither, am I going?”).

Typical of the entries is that for “The Burden Lifted” in which the imagined sufferer worries for his family and exclaims, “How can I leave my wife and children?” The “Unseen Friend” replies with Old Testament passages meant to comfort, such as “Leave thy fatherless children; I will preserve them alive; and let thy widows trust in me,” (Jer. 49:11) and “Thou art the helper of the fatherless,” (Ps. 10:14), and verses from a popular poem of the era, “The Voice Calling”:

Ah, Thou still art calling, calling,
With a soft voice unappalling;
And it vibrates in far circles through the everlasting years;

When Thon knockest, even so!
I will arise and go

Of Mrs. Brown’s tract, one wartime nurse – Elizabeth Comstock – wrote:

“As I entered one of the wards the nurse approached me with a very warm greeting, saying how glad she was to see me…She took me to a small room where lay a poor young soldier whom she thought very near death...I replaced the bandage tenderly and carefully...The blue eyes opened and he cast an earnest, appealing look at me, and seeing he was conscious I spoke a few words to him about mother and home, Jesus and heaven. Large tears gathered in his eyes and rolled down his cheeks as he made an effort to speak...I had a little book with me, Words of Healing for the Sick Soldier, from which I read him a few sentences. He seemed to understand, and looked longingly at the book, which I handed to him…”

Tracts meant to comfort soldiers in the hospitals were by no means unique to the North. The University of North Carolina’s excellent “Documenting the South” online collection includes the full text of a number of similar publications, including A Word of Comfort for the Sick Soldier, A Word of Warning for the Sick Soldier, The Wounded Soldier, and In the Hospital - by the Rev. George B. Taylor - in which he beseeches the soldier to not “yield to a feeling of discontent, because you are laid aside from active duty,” adding:

“Yours is now the more difficult, and the no less useful part. Every right thinking person regards the sick or wounded soldier, who patiently and cheerfully suffers his appointed time, as no less heroic than when marching or fighting; and doubtless, the historian of this war will refer to our hospitals as being not less glorious to our people than our bloody and victorious battle fields.”

Historians have questioned the actual impact of the tracts on the Yankee and Rebel soldiery. In Soldiers Blue and Gray, James Robertson stated that officers resented the tracts because the ubiquitous references to death and final judgment “unnerved the fighting man and made him unreliable in battle.” Likewise, in the classic The Life of Billy Yank, Bell Wiley declared that “soldier letters and diaries do not sustain the conclusion” that tracts were warmly received, widely read, or “productive of distinct improvement in religion and morals.”

Still, of the special case of the sick and wounded, Union army chaplain James B. Rogers, in his mid-war memoir, War Pictures, declared, “The men in the hospitals showed special eagerness to obtain religious books and tracts.” Rogers wrote that he “aimed always to have a supply” to help the soldiers “while away the slow hours of the day in camp, or the more tedious period of convalescence in the hospitals.”

Helen Brown closed her booklet with some “Parting Words”:

“Farewell, dear friend. If the brief messages I have brought you have been pleasant and comfortable, if they have proved a healing or refreshing draught, I am sincerely thankful.”

Perhaps the ailing soldiers silently thanked her in return.

Thursday, December 17, 2009

Civil War Phrenological Profiles #1 - Abraham Lincoln - "The Face of a Well-Meaning Man"

I'm pleased to continue my series on the origins and popularity of phrenology in the 19th century, especially during the Civil War. For a refresher, see Part I (Origins) and Part II (Americanizing Phrenology).

This post also introduces a new feature of the blog, in which I'll include engravings and extended excerpts of text from the phrenological profiles of leading wartime figures, as published in the American Phrenological Journal, a very popular feature of the day, and mnay of which I have in my own collection.

We begin with the central figure, Abraham Lincoln! This profile actually appeared in the October 1864 issue (it was a monthly), just before that year's elections. Indeed, the editors began with the following disclaimer:

"PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES - It is our intention to publish from time to time, portraits and descriptions of the several candidates nominated by the different conventions. We disclaim any mere party bias, but profess loyalty to the Government, and to look on from a higher stand-point. We may therefore take an impartial view of the different would-be "public servants," and describe them accordingly. When the times comes for the people to choose their officers of trust on phrenological principles, we shall feel a deeper interest. Then we may hope to have, not a set of noisy, drunken rowdies to fill important posts - but capable and honest men. Then we shall have in each department "THE RIGHT MAN IN THE RIGHT PLACE."

Lincolns' profile then begins with his physiognomy:

"Our portrait of Mr. Lincoln is from a recent photograph of Brady, and was engraved for our use. If not perfect, it is at least one of the best yet produced. Mr. Lincoln has a tall, spare, large-boned frame, with which his thin, prominent features perfectly correspond, and a head above the average size, and most fully developed in the superior portions. The reader will observe how high, long, and broad the top-head is, and how honest, truthful, and decided the accompanying expression of countenance. Mr. Lincoln has not a poetical or a sentimental organization, nor has been training been such as to foster romance or fancy. His whole make-up denotes a matter-of-fact mind. Taken separately, his features are by no means classical, but, in combination, they assume a very decided and strongly marked expression of character. Nor is this the repulsive face his enemies would make it out to be. On the contrary, it will pass, in all coming time, for the face of a well-meaning man. Let us look again at this not unattractive face which has been so much uncaricatured and so often held up in the South as that of a monster to frighten foolish people."

They then continue with some specifics of his phrenology:

"...and a forehead ample, but not ponderous, the perceptive faculties - Individuality, Form, Size, Order, Eventuality, and Locality - being among the largest; hence he is very practical, and abounding in facts. There is more mechanism than music indicated; more prose than poetry...there is, in Mr. Lincoln's face, when listening to pleasant and animated discourse, a most interesting and winning smile, the whole countenance being lighted up with a sunny and benignant glow."

What of that head?

"The size of the head is in fair proportion to that of the body...It is not the head of a fighter, and he can take no pleasure in combat or contention. Were there more of the lion in him he would be less patient and more executive...Mr. Lincoln has been called a gorilla, a Nero, etc., when the truth is he is far more like a lamb or a Howard, both in feeling and in character. He is called "slow." He is certainly not fast, but he proceeds cautiously, leaving it for circumstances or for Providence to indicate the when and the way to act."

What of his religion?

"He has large Benevolence, large Concientiousness, and large Hope. His Veneration is full, and his Spirituality average. His religion consists more in kindness an justice than in faith, humility or devotion. To do right and to do good are his leading moral characteristics. Socially he is strong in his attachments, constant in his affections, and wel adapted to wedded life. Intellectually, there is nothing wanting. His Causality is full, Comparison is large, and nearly all the perceptives large and active."

An Endorsement?

"In conclusion: he is open to conviction, true to his higher nature, and goverened by moral principle rather than by policy. He is firm, persevering, generous, kind-hearted, affectionate, intelligent with a high degree of strong, practical common sense. If not great, is he not good? If not the best man for the situation, where can you find a better?"

More profiles are coming over the next several weeks, including Winfield Hancock, U.S. Grant, John Wilkes Booth, George Meade, and more!

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Meanwhile, Back at the Ranch...

A couple of months ago I announced that I had started another blog to chronicle the research and writing I was doing for my current book project, Notre Dame in the Civil War: Marching Onward to Victory (The History Press, 2010). Here's a quick run-down of my posts-to-date:

Enjoy and I'll post more links as they come!

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

All I Want for Christmas is...A CHEMISTRY SET!

As a chemist by day and a historiographer by night (and sometimes by lunch!) I always like those opportunities when the two worlds "collide"!

Some of my very first writing projects were with a great industry magazine put out by the American Chemical Society called Today's Chemist. Unfortunately it is now defunct, but I did get the opportunity to write some article for them a few years back, including "An Officer and a Chemist" (about the early history of the chemistry department at West Point), "A Chemist is Loyal, Helpful..." (about the history of the chemistry merit badge), and - the topic of this post: "Today's Toy Becomes Tomorrow's Trade," about the history of chemistry sets!

One of the great parts about writing the article was soliciting stories from chemists about their memories of chemistry sets...read the article and you'll see!

I also like to collect chemistry set ephemera, including old advertisements, some of which you'll see below...these are from the 1910s to the 1940s.

Enjoy!









Sunday, November 22, 2009

Medical Department #31 - A Dangerous Toy for Christmas (in 1865!)

The newest installment of my "Medical Department" column in The Civil War News has a definite holiday twist! It's about a toy that was very popular in 1865 and - as -it turns out - also very dangerous! Enjoy!

WHAT’S UNDER THE TREE IN 1865? (HINT: IT’S DANGEROUS!)
By James M. Schmidt
The Civil War News – “Medical Department” – December 2009


“The chemical toy which is now sold largely in many shops in this city, at prices ranging from threepence to one shilling each, is composed of a highly dangerous and poisonous substance… The material is a doubleheaded poisoned arrow, for it contains two poisonous ingredients…either of which will kill.” – Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 1865

With the holiday season just around the corner, I recently pulled a favorite old book off the shelf: Philip Van Doren Stern’s The Civil War Christmas Album (New York: Hawthorn, 1961). Among the illustrations are two pages of period ads for holiday gifts; some are for soldiers, including an “army watch,” “Union playing cards,” and personalized badges. There are also advertisements for children, including musical boxes and one that really caught my eye: “Pharaoh’s Serpents.”

The ad intrigued me in no small part because I’m a chemist by day, and I wondered if they might be an ancestor, so to speak, of the “black snake” fireworks (that anyone can buy today) which – upon lighting – expel a snake-like ash. They are, indeed; but they are a very dangerous ancestor! The “Pharaoh’s Serpents” were very popular during the 1865 Christmas season in America, having appeared in Paris earlier that year. Unfortunately, the 1860’s version of “black snakes” was composed of a very dangerous substance – mercuric thiocyanate – and by January 1866, newspapers carried reports of poisonings and even deaths!

That mercuric thiocyanate produced the fascinating expanding effect had been known for decades. In 1821, as a young medical student, the famous chemist Friedrich Wohler wrote that upon heating, the chemical could be seen “winding out from itself…worm-like…to many times its former bulk.” It became a staple of laboratory demonstrations, and in mid-1865, Scientific American magazine reported that “a very ingenious Frenchman has adopted the plan of putting little cones of the substance into boxes, and selling them for a franc apiece.” They soon became popular throughout Europe and – not surprisingly - appeared in America in time for the Christmas season in 1865.

As early as November 1865, however, scientists were warning the public of the possible dangers of the popular toy. The Lancet - the leading medical journal in Great Britain – described the chemical components of the toy, and declared:

“It is very necessary that persons with delicate lungs, or suffering from any disease of those organs, should be most careful not to inhale the products of the combustion of the “serpents' eggs”; and in all cases great care should be taken that the room in which these toys are burned be freely ventilated. So satisfied are the authorities in Prussia of their deleterious properties, that the Government has forbidden their sale except by persons who are specially authorized to sell poisons.”

At about the same time, English poet Charles Tennyson Turner - brother to the British poet laureate, Alfred, Lord Tennyson – teased his niece, Agnes, upon receipt of one of the toys, also hinting at their danger:

“I return you in a manner good for evil, viz., two respectable sonnets…in return for a poisonous serpent, for this Pharaoh's Serpent has got into the newspapers… and is represented as very dangerous for children and even adults. It is composed of the most deleterious material, and, moreover, looks like a sweetmeat, and whether burnt or inadvertently eaten by a hapless bairn, will work its woe. We have not tried it yet, partly because we thought a tiny or two of our village might like to see it. But we shall give it, knowing its awful character, in private and with precautions. What do you mean, you apparently harmless female hobble-de-hoy, by sending down to our unsophisticated village this fragment of ancient Egypt! Your horned poppy and shingle-grown nightshade are better.”

A humorous incident, reported in newspapers across the country in spring 1866, occurred when a fidgety boy in Quincy, Illinois, played with the toy in an unlikely place:

“A young man named Spencer went to church…with some matches and some ‘eggs of Pharaoh’s serpents’ in his pocket. The sermon was long and the young man became uneasy; the matches were lighted by the friction caused by his movements, the eggs hatched, and the serpents made their way out of his pocket, wriggling and squirming with a great and disagreeable smell of burning chemicals. The congregation were greatly scandalized, and the clergyman considered the illustration of his denunciations of the wicked a very feeble one.”

But all was not fun-and-games. Other papers carried a report on a terrible incident in which three men were killed in London, “while engaged in the manufacture of so-called ‘Pharaoh’s serpents,’ the composition having exploded.” At about the same time, The Boston Medical and Surgical Journal published descriptions of two case studies; in one, a woman presented herself with “eruptions” on her face and body, which the examining surgeon attributed to the gases from the “Pharaoh’s serpents” with which she had been playing.

In the other case, a woman arrived at Massachusetts General Hospital with similar skin eruptions. The journal reported that her son, “had broken up several of these ‘eggs’ in his pocket and had handled the fragments freely. She had mended his pockets the night before the eruption showed itself, and had removed the debris with her fingers without washing her hands before going to bed.” The doctor further declared that “violent inflammation of the lungs had ensued in one case after inhalation of the vapor arising from the combustion of these little toys, and that in Europe several cases of poisoning had occurred from eating them by mistake for bonbons.”

Like many “must have” gifts, the fascination with “Pharaoh’s serpents” began to wane by the next holiday season, due in no small part to reports of the dangers in playing with them. Other toys – many of them chemical tricks – were popular by Christmas in 1866, including “magic photographs,” “rainbow bubbles,” “Japanese fireworks,” and “crocodiles’ tears,” which consisted of potassium in a soluble casing that blazed when thrown into water.

Today’s “black snakes” are made of safer materials and continue to entertain (in fact, people began to suggest safer alternatives in 1866). Still, the 1865 toy left an interesting social, scientific, and medical legacy.